Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon 550

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Boost Clock1183MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +779%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon 550
1.211 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net