Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG
+15%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
