Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro V5300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro V5300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1201MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+332%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V5300X
2.46 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
