Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro VII

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro VII

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro VII +22%
13.06 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3840
256
TMUs
240
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.23 billion
Unknown
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net