Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 440.3GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1683MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
P102 100
+1%
10.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
4096
Shading Units
3200
256
TMUs
200
256
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
11.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
