Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Boost Clock1855MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+103%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500
5.224 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1744 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
