Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W9070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon PRO W9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 268.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon PRO W9070 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+115%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W9070
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
256
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
180W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
