Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+775%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
