Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Boost Clock1175MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +405%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560D
2.106 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Polaris 21
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net