Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Boost Clock1420MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+62%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 GME
6.543 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1257 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1420 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.44 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
204.5 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.543 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.543 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
409.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTR
(215-0910066)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
