Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs ATI Radeon X1050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
8
256
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
24W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV410
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.12 billion
Unknown
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-
