Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 64
+18%
12.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.33 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
295W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
