Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+18%
12.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
