Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (185W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +104%
15.56 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
256
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
185W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net