Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+3920%
15.56 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
