Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +2097%
15.56 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net