Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 350W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages
Boost Clock1695MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3090
+128%
35.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1219 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
936.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
82
4096
Shading Units
10496
256
TMUs
328
256
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
328
-
RT Cores
82
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.0 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
35.58 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.58 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
350W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-300-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
