Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+57%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
8192
256
TMUs
512
256
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
22 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
