Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs ATI Radeon X1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0
