Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+48%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
4096
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
160
256
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
