Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Intel Arc A310

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +814%
24.58 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
768
512
TMUs
32
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
30W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
22 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net