Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +270%
91.06 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
8192
Shading Units
18176
512
TMUs
568
512
ROPs
192
128
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
300W
850 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net