Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+62925%
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
8192
Shading Units
16
512
TMUs
8
512
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
31W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
