Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+762%
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
896
512
TMUs
56
512
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
80W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
