Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+3851%
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2010
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
8192
Shading Units
240
512
TMUs
80
512
ROPs
28
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
219W
850 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
