Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 672.3GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (285W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+79%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
66
8192
Shading Units
8448
512
TMUs
264
512
ROPs
96
128
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
285W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
