Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (425W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 D
+199%
73.54 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
114
8192
Shading Units
14592
512
TMUs
456
512
ROPs
176
128
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
425W
850 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
