Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+130%
24.58 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
4096
512
TMUs
256
512
ROPs
256
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
150W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
