Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Moore Threads MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+400%
24.58 TFLOPS
MTT S50
4.915 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
8192
Shading Units
2048
512
TMUs
128
512
ROPs
128
128
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
85W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
GPU Variant
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
