Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Moore Threads MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S80 's Advantages
Lower TDP (255W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+66%
24.58 TFLOPS
MTT S80
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
8192
Shading Units
4096
512
TMUs
256
512
ROPs
256
128
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
255W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
GPU Variant
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
22 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
