Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (450W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+232%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
19456
512
TMUs
1216
512
ROPs
0
128
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
1000W
850 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
153 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
N/A
