Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
4096 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (450W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Boost Clock1720MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +74%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II
14.09 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
4096
512
TMUs
256
512
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
475W
850 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
22 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
Unknown
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net