Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+1423%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
768
512
TMUs
48
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
100W
850 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
