Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (450W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +328%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2816
512
TMUs
176
512
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
500W
850 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net