Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon RX 590
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (175W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+245%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590
7.119 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2018
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2304
512
TMUs
144
512
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
175W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Polaris 30
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT
(215-0922006)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
