Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2007
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
-
512
TMUs
4
512
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
Unknown
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI
1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
Unknown
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0
