Moore Threads MTT S10 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM MTT S10 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S10 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
MTT S10
2.048 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+420%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2023
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
32
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GPU Variant
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
