Home GPU Comparison MTT S50 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

MTT S50 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM MTT S50 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S50 +52%
5.2 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Nov 2012
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1792
TMUs
112
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.2 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
375W
W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

SuDi
GPU Name
Tahiti
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
MUSA
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
Unknown
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy