Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +32284%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Sep 2021
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
70
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA100
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy