Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FirePro V7750

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 76W)
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750 +1212%
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

18W
TDP
76W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV730
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy