Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +5146%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2013
NVS
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1152
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GK104
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy