Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100 +1553%
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy