Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +36028%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2019
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Vega 20
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy