Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +9079%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 24
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy