Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2341%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Dec 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy