Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled +33515%
13.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2017
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1382 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
409.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.21 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.11 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
819.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Vega 10
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX LCS
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy