Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (20W vs 48W)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750 +252%
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV730
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy