Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +1756%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2011
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Cayman
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy