Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +4316%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2019
NVS
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
20
48
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
TU116
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy