Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 +4927%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2019
NVS
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
22
48
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
TU116
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy